VS Series

Caprice Holdings v Zuma

Two London restaurant empires, one plate at a time

Zuma leads on 5 of the five measures that matter most: turnover, pre-tax profit, profit margin, growth and net assets. Zuma is the biggest by turnover at £203m, against £90m at Caprice Holdings. Zuma keeps more of every £100 it takes, £14.74 as pre-tax profit.

The year ends are up to 12 months apart, so this compares each company's most recent filing rather than the same twelve months. Zuma files group accounts that include subsidiaries; Caprice Holdings files for a single company, which flatters the group on size.

Accounts compared: Caprice Holdings to Jan 2026 · Zuma to Dec 2024

The Numbers

#CompanyTurnoverChangePre-tax profitMarginEmployeesPay per headTurnover per headNet assetsBank and cashAccounts toBasis
1 ZumaAzumi Limited £203m -1.0% £30m 14.7% 2,149 £28,000 £94,000 £73m £28m Dec 2024 Group
2 Caprice HoldingsCaprice Holdings Limited £90m -3.9% £8m 9.1% 1,006 £32,000 £90,000 £28m £1.9m Jan 2026 Single company

Ranked by turnover. Click any column to sort. The leader on each measure is highlighted. Movements are against each company's own prior year. Pre-tax profit is filed except where marked (est.).

Category winners

The Takeaway

  1. Zuma converts the most of its turnover. Of every £100, £14.74 reaches pre-tax profit, against £9.11 at Caprice Holdings.
  2. Zuma is the largest on the top line, £203m of turnover, 2.2x Caprice Holdings's £90m.
  3. Zuma is growing fastest, turnover -1.0% on its own prior year. Caprice Holdings and Zuma went backwards.
  4. Zuma is the biggest employer with 2,149 people; Caprice Holdings pays the most per head, an average staff cost of about £32,000.
  5. Zuma has the largest balance sheet, net assets of £73m.

Who keeps the most of every £100 of sales?

Zuma keeps the most: £14.74 of every £100 of turnover becomes pre-tax profit. Caprice Holdings keeps the least, £9.11.

Every profit figure here is the one the company filed.

The chart splits each company's turnover into £100: what goes on people, on interest and on everything else, and what is left as profit.

Out of every £100 of turnover

£100£0 Payroll: £29.95 of every £100Payroll£29.95Financing: £1.47 of every £100Other costs: £53.85 of every £100Other costs£53.85Profit: £14.74 of every £100Profit £14.74ZumaYear to Dec 2024£203m turnoverPayroll: £35.46 of every £100Payroll£35.46Financing: £1.46 of every £100Other costs: £53.96 of every £100Other costs£53.96Profit: £9.11 of every £100Profit £9.11Caprice HoldingsYear to Jan 2026£90m turnover
Payroll (staff costs)Financing (interest paid)Other running costsPre-tax profitLoss: the costs beyond £100

Each column is £100 of that company's own turnover, so companies of any size compare on one scale; the figures are pounds out of each £100, not millions. Companies run from the best margin to the worst. Payroll is staff costs, financing is interest paid, other running costs are everything else, and profit is pre-tax profit, filed or estimated as marked in the table. A loss is not an extra cost: it is the part of the costs that runs past the £100 line, marked with a red bracket. Hover over any segment for its figure.

Who is the biggest, and does the comparison hold?

By turnover the order is Zuma (£203m), Caprice Holdings (£90m).

By headcount, Zuma leads with 2,149 employees.

The comparison holds with the dates stated plainly: Caprice Holdings to Jan 2026, Zuma to Dec 2024. The bases differ: group accounts include the businesses a company owns, single-company accounts do not.

Zuma£203mCaprice Holdings£90m

Turnover on the latest filing

Who is growing fastest?

Zuma grew fastest, turnover -1.0% on its own prior year, ahead of Caprice Holdings (-3.9%).

Zuma-1.0%Caprice Holdings-3.9%

Turnover change on each company's own prior year

Who employs the most, who pays the most, and who brings in the most per head?

Zuma employs the most, 2,149 people, against 1,006 at Caprice Holdings.

Caprice Holdings has the highest average staff cost, about £32,000 a head; Zuma the lowest, about £28,000.

Zuma brings in the most turnover per employee, about £94,000, against £90,000 at Caprice Holdings. It says as much about the business model as the workforce: a marketplace or a wholesaler needs far fewer people per pound than a restaurant or a gym.

What does the full ledger show?

MeasureCaprice HoldingsZuma
Registered nameCAPRICE HOLDINGS LIMITEDAZUMI LIMITED
Company number0166134904163938
Incorporated19822001
Accounts filed4 September 20268 September 2025
Turnover, prior year£94m£205m
Pre-tax profit, prior year-£26m£41m
Staff costs£32m£61m
Payroll share of turnover35.5%29.9%
Employees, prior year1,1162,118
Dividends paidn/d£40m
Charges outstanding116

A figure the filing does not disclose is shown as n/d; a zero in a filing is treated as not disclosed. Rounding: below £0.1m in thousands, £0.1m to £2m to one decimal place, above that to the nearest million.

Caprice Holdings v Zuma: common questions

Who is the biggest of Caprice Holdings or Zuma?

Zuma, with turnover of £203m in the year to December 2024.

Which makes the most profit?

Zuma: £30m pre-tax in the year to December 2024.

Which employs the most people?

Zuma, with 2,149 employees in its latest accounts.

Caprice Holdings or Zuma: which is bigger?

Zuma, with turnover of £203m against £90m at Caprice Holdings on their latest filings. On margin, Zuma keeps more of each £100 as pre-tax profit. The full head to head is in the VS Series. Read the VS page →

Where do these figures come from?

Each company's latest accounts filed at Companies House. Each links to its full Spark Intel profile, which names the filing it comes from.